Collection Summary

Creator: R. Randolph Hicks
Title: R. Randolph Hicks Collection of Records of Appellate Court Cases in Virginia
Accession: MSS 2016-04
Description: 10 bound volumes
Location: Special Collections
Photograph Collection: View 0 digitized photographs
Digitized Content: 0 objects

Collection Description & Arrangement

This collection contains 10 volumes of briefs for cases in which Mr. Hicks participated. Two of the volumes pertain to the Stein, et al v. Morris, et al suit, related the Morris Plan banks. 

Biographical & Historical Information

R. Randolph Hicks was born in Warrenton, Fauquier Co. Virginia in 1870. The son of Robert J. and Nannie T. (Randolph) Hicks, he studied at the University of Virginia where he graduated from the Law Department in 1890.  After graduation, he moved to Roanoke where he practice several years. He was member of the Virginia House of Delegates for Roanoke City from 1897-1898. 


Mr. Hicks moved to Norfolk in 1898 and became an important trial lawyer. In 1915, the UVA Alumni Bulletin informed that "R. Randolph Hicks, '90, Arthur J. Morris, "01, Theodore S. Garnett, Jr., '98 & Richard Tunstall, '10, announce the consolidation of their law offices under the firm name of Hicks, Morris, Garnett & Tunstall."  Their practice was advertised as "General Practice in State and Federal Courts, with particular attention to Corporation, Financial, Admiralty and Commecial Law, including complete Collection Department."


Hicks moved to New York City in 1917 as partner of the law firm of Satterlee, Canfield and Stone. He was in charge of litigation related to the Morris Plan Corporation of America. 

He died July 1, 1951.

Acquisition Information

Date Received 2016

Content List

Vol. I

Postal Telegraph-Cable Company vs. Martin, Judge, et al – On Application for Writ of Prohibition. Argument for the Petitioner. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Wytheville, undated

Postal Telegraph-Cable Company vs. Martin, Judge, et al – Petition of Writ of Prohibition. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Wytheville (John Cook Printer, Wytheville, VA) [1906]

Seaboard and Roanoke Railroad Company vs. Vaughn's Administratix. Brief of G,. Hatton, Counsel for Plaintiff-in-Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, undated.

Rosa A. Vaughan, Administratrix vs. Seaboard & Roanoke Railroad Co.  On Appeal from the Circuit Court of Norfolk County.  Brief of Counsel for Appellee. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, undated.

Seaboard and Roanoke Railroad Company vs. Vaughan’s Administratix.  D. M. No. 27 IA.  From the Circuit Court of Norfolk County [Brief], Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1904.

Berkley Street Railway Company vs. J. R. Simpson. Brief of Counsel for Appellee. Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of Virginia [1904]

Berkley Street Railway Co. v. Simpson, D. M. No. 64 KA, from the Circuit Court of Norfolk County, Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1905

The Cosmopolitan Club vs. The Commonwealth of Virginia.  In Error to the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of Virginia. Transcript of Record.  Supreme Court of the United States, October Term, 1906, No. 451, Filed October 4, 1906 (20, 416). 

The Cosmopolitan Club vs. The Commonwealth of Virginia. Brief of William A. Anderson, Attorney General, for the Defendant in Error. Supreme Court of the United States, October Term, 1907, No. 130.

Cosmopolitan Social Club v. Commonwealth of Virginia.  Brief of Appellant.  Supreme Court of the United States, No. 451, [1906]

Cosmopolitan Club vs. Commonwealth of Virginia.  Reply Brief of Counsel for Plaintiff in Error. Supreme Court of the United States, October Term, 1907. [208 U.S. 378, 28 S.Ct. 394, 52 L.Ed. 536]

Joseph L. James and E. W. James, Trading as Joseph L. & E. W. James, Alleged Bankrupts versus Wheeling Corrugating Co., Gurney Heater Manufacturing Co., G. & A Bargamin Co. and P. S. Stephenson. United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. No. 571. Transcript of Record. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk, September 28th, 1904.

Joseph L. James and E. W. James, Trading as Joseph L. & E. W. James, Alleged Bankrupts versus Wheeling Corrugating Co., Gurney Heater Manufacturing Co., G. & A Bargamin Co. and P. S. Stephenson. United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. No. 571.  Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk, undated.

Joseph L. James and E. W. James, Trading as Joseph L. & E. W. James, Alleged Bankrupts versus Wheeling Corrugating Co., Gurney Heater Manufacturing Co., G. & A Bargamin Co. and P. S. Stephenson. United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. No. 577. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Reply Brief of R. Randolph Hicks, Counsel for Appellants. (W. T. Barron & Co., Norfolk, VA), undated.

Standard Sewing Machine Company vs. Gunter. Brief of Appellee. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, [1904]

Standard Sewing Machine Company vs. C. C. Gunter. In Chancery. Reply Brief of Appellant.  Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, [1904]

Standard Sewing Machine Company vs. Gunter. D. M. No.-18 Ha.  From the Court of Law and Chancery of the City of Norfolk, Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, [1904]

 

Volume II

Edmunds and Blackford, Trustees vs. Hobbie Piano Co., et als.  Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Wytheville.  From the Circuit Court of Roanoke City.(D. A. St. Claire Press, Wytheville, VA), 1899

Edmunds & Blackford, Trustees vs. Hobbie Piano Co., et als. Reply Brief of Counsel for Appellants. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Wytheville, VA (Sentinel Pub. Co., Power Print, Salem, VA), undated.

E. White et als vs. Valley Building & Investment Co. Brief of Counsel for Appellant. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Wytheville, VA (Sentinel Pub. Co., Power Print, Salem, VA), undated.

Rorer & Didier vs. S. D. Ferguson et als. Brief of Counsel for Appellants. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Wytheville, VA (Sentinel Pub. Co., Power Print, Salem, VA) [1895-1896]

Roanoke Street Railway Company vs. R. R. Hicks, Trustee, M. M. Rogers, and the Fidelity Insurance, Trust and Safe Deposit Company. Petition for Rehearing. Supreme Court of Appeals of VA at Richmond, Virginia. (Times-Register Job Print, Salem, VA), undated.

Sale vs. Hanckel. Brief of Counsel for W. W. Sale. In the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, undated.

Tidewater Quarry Co. v. Scott. D. M. No. 95 Ia.  From the Court of Law and Chancery of the City of Norfolk. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1905.

Crall v. Commonwealth.  D. M. No. 24 Ia. From the Circuit Court of Chesterfield County. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, [1904]

Crall v. Commonwealth. Brief for the Commonwealth of Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, undated.

Crall & Ostrander v. Commonwealth. Brief for the Commonwealth of Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, undated.

Crall & Ostrander v. Commonwealth. Reply Brief of Counsel for Appellants. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, undated.

Crall & Ostrander v. Commonwealth. Petition of W. F. Crall for Re-Hearing. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1905.

Crall, &c. vs. Commonwealth. D. M. No. 18 Ia. From the Corporation Court of the City of Manchester. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1904.

Rhea and Others vs. Shields, Trustee &c. D. M. No-85 Ga. From the Circuit Court of Law and Chancery of the City of Norfolk, Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1902.

Rhea and Others vs. Shields and Others. Brief of Appellees (Except the Appellee Moses G. Nusbaum,) in Support of Demurrer Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, undated.

Rhea and Others vs. Shields and Others. . Brief for Counsel of Moses G. Nusbaum. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond (Oeo W. Owen & Son, Printers, Norfolk, VA), 1902.

Rhea and Others vs. Shields and Others. Reply Brief of Counsel for Appellants. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia (Burke & Gregory, Print, Norfolk), undated.

Rhea and Others vs. Shields and Others. Brief of Additional Record by Counsel for Appellants. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, VA, (W. T. Barron & Co., Norfolk, VA), undated.

Rhea and Others vs. Shields and Others. Supplemental Brief on Additional Record by Counsel for Appellee Moses G. Nusbaum. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, undated.

Rhea and Others vs. Shields and Others. Supplemental Brief on Additional Record by Counsel for Appellee, M. Duggan. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, undated.

Rhea and Others vs. Shields, Trustee, &c. In the Court of Law and Chancery of the City of Norfolk. L. H. Shields, substituted trustee for William H. Rhea, Sr., under the will of Robert Rhea, Sr., deceased vs. William H. Rhea, Sr., Annie M. Rhea, Columbus A. Rhea, William H. Rhea, Jr., John Marshall Rhea, Harry L. Rhea who is an infant under the age of twenty-one years. Additional Brief of Counsel for Appellees (Except Nusbaum). Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, (W. T. Barron & Co., Norfolk, VA), undated.

Rhea and Others vs. Shields and Others. Reply Brief of R. Randolph Hicks, Counsel for Appellants, on the Additional Record. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, (W. T. Barron & Co., Norfolk, VA), undated.

Rhea and Others vs. Shields and Others. Reply of Appellants Resisting Motion to Dismiss Appeal. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, undated.

Rhea and Others vs. Shields Trustee, et als. Petition for Rehearing. Brief of R. Randolph Hicks, Counsel for Petitioners. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1904

Rhea and Others vs. Shields and Others. Supplemental Brief on Additional Record by Counsel for Appellee, Moses G. Nusbaum. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, undated.

 

Vol. III

Norfolk & Portsmouth Traction Co. vs. Ellington’s Administrator. Brief for the Appellee. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (Printed by Whittet & Shepperson, Richmond, VA)

Riverside Residence Company vs. Lily B. Husted. Brief of Counsel for Plaintiff-In-Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (Tidewater Printing and Blank Book Co., Norfolk, VA) [1906]

Riverside Residence Company vs. Lily B. Husted. Brief of Counsel for Defendant-in-Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (Tidewater Printing and Blank Book Co., Norfolk, VA)

Riverside Residence Company, Inc. vs. Husted. Record 220. From the Court of Law and Chancery of the City of Norfolk. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1908

Columbia Amusement Company, et al v. Pine Beach Investment Corporation, by &c. Record 181.  From the Court of Law and Chancery of the City of Norfolk. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1908]

Columbia Amusement Company, et al v. Pine Beach Investment Corporation, by Etc. Brief of Counsel for Defendant in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. [Annotated, 1908]

Columbia Amusement Company, et als v. Pine Beach Investment Corporation. Reply Brief of Counsel for Defendant in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond.

Jordan & Davis v. Edward Mahoney. Record No. 162. In the Court of Law and Chancery of the City of Norfolk, 1908

Edward Mahoney v. Jordan & Davis. Reply Brief of Counsel for Appellant. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (W. T. Barron & Co., Norfolk)

Jordan & Davis v. Edward Mahoney. Brief of Edward Mahoney, the Appellee. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, undated.

Tilton et al v. Herman, Treasurer, et als. Record No. 218. From the Court of Law and Chancery of the City of Norfolk, Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1908

John G. Tilton, et al v. H. S. Sherman, Treasurer, et als. Brief for Defendants in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. 

John G. Tilton, et al v. H. S. Sherman, Treasurer, et als. Brief of Counsel for Appellants. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia.

John G. Tilton, et al v. H. S. Sherman, Treasurer, and Others. Reply Brief of William A. Anderson, Attorney General, Files on Behalf of the Plaintiff in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond.  Annotated, 1909

Wood vs. Wood et als. Brief of Counsel for Appellees. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (Tidewater Printing and Blank Book Co., Norfolk, VA), undated.

Wood’s Executor et als vs. Wood et als. Reply Brief of Counsel for Appellants. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (Tidewater Printing and Blank Book Co., Norfolk, VA)

Wood’s Exor., et als vs. Wood et als. Record No. 166. From the Circuit Court of Norfolk County. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. Annotated, 1908

Jordan & Davis, et als vs. Annex Corporation, et als. Brief of the Appellees. From the Circuit Court of Norfolk City. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (W. T. Barron & Co., Norfolk), undated.

Jordan & Davis, et als vs. Annex Corporation, et als. Reply Brief of Counsel for Appellants. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (Barron & Co., Norfolk), undated.

Jordan & Davis, et als vs. Annex Corporation, et als.  Record No. 234. From the Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk, 1908.

 

Vol. IV

Consolvo & Cheshire vs. The Ferries Company. Reply Brief of Counsel for the Plaintiff in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (W. T. Barron & Co., Norfolk). Annotated, undated.

Consolvo & Cheshire vs. The Ferries Company. Record No. 467. From the Corporation Court of the City of Norfolk. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. Annotated, 1910

The Ferries Company ads. Consolvo & Cheshire. Brief of Counsel for Defendant in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, Richmond, undated.

So. Mutual Aid Association, et al v. Blount, et als. Record 411. From the Court of Law and Chancery of the City of Norfolk. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. Annotated, 1910.

Southern Mutual Aid Association vs. D. P. Blount, et als. Brief of Counsel for Appellees. Supreme Court of Virginia, Richmond, undated.

A. J. Phillips v. City of Portsmouth. Brief of Defendant in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. Annotated, undated.

A. J. Phillips [& T. J. Wood] vs. City of Portsmouth. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia, Richmond. Annotated, undated.

A. J. Phillips v. City of Portsmouth. Petition for Writ of Error. Record No. 438. From the City Court of the City of Portsmouth. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. Annotated, undated.

MacNamara [sic.] Syndicate v. Boyd. Record No. 436. From the Court of Law and Chancery of the City of Norfolk. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1910.

McNamara Syndicate v. Boyd. Reply Brief of Counsel for McNamara Syndicate. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond.

Adamson’s Administrator vs. Norfolk & Portsmouth Traction Company, et als. Brief of Attorney for Plaintiff in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. Undated.

Adamson’s Administrator vs. Norfolk & Portsmouth Traction Co., et al. Brief on Behalf of the Defendant Norfolk & Portsmouth Traction Company.Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (Whittet & Shepperson, Printers, Richmond, VA) [1907]

Adamson’s Administrator vs. Norfolk & Portsmouth Traction Co., et al. Record No. 325. From the Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1909.

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company vs. Mary E. Hayslett. Supplemental Brief of Counsel for the Defendant in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. 

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, a Corporation vs. Mary E. Hayslett. Brief of Attorney for the Defendant in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond [1907]

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company vs. Mary E. Hayslett. Reply Brief of Counsel for Plaintiff-in-Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond.  Jeffries, Wolcott, Wolcott& Lankford, for Plaintiff-in-Error. Annotated, undated.

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, A Corporation v. Mary E. Hayslett. Record No. 349. From the Circuit Court of Norfolk County. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond,1909. [Inserted is a Western Union Telegram from Charlottesville to Mr. Hicks that reads: “Nothing on Military Law.  The MYHER Co.”, p. 86]

H. Nixdorf vs. D. P. Blount. Brief of Counsel for Appellees. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia.

Nixdorff [sic.] v. Blount, et als. Record No. 328, From the Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk. Supreme Court of Virginia at Richmond. Annotated, 1909.

 

Vol. V

Exposition Arcade Corporation v. Lit Brothers, Brief of Edward R. Baird, Jr., Counsel for the Appellee. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, Va. [undated]

Exposition Arcade Corporation v. Lit Brothers. Record 565. From the Court of Law and Chancery of the City of Norfolk, 2011

Lit Brothers vs. Exposition Arcade Corporation, Reply Brief of Counsel for Appellant. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond [undated]

George Bonos v. The Ferries Company. Record 558. From the Corporation Court of the City of Norfolk. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1911.

George Bonos v. The Ferries Company, Reply Brief of Counsel for Defendant in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia (Press of Eugene L. Graves, Inc., Norfolk, Va.) [Undated]

George Bonos v. The Ferries Company. Brief of Counsel for Norfolk County. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, Va. [undated]

A. C. Smith v. R. F. Bell et als. Record No. 569. From the Circuit Court of Princess Anne County. Brief of Defendants in Error (Press of Eugene L. Graves, Inc., Norfolk, Va.)

A. C. Smith v. R. F. Bell et als. Reply Brief of Counsel for Plaintiff in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond [undated]

A. C. Smith v. R. F. Bell et als. Record No. 569. Statement of Facts. From the Circuit Court of Princess Anne County. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1911.

 

Vol. VI

Tisdale vs. Commonwealth. Reply Brief of Plaintiff in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (Eugene L. Graves, Inc., Norfolk, VA)

Tisdale vs. Commonwealth. Brief on Behalf of Commonwealth. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond.

Tisdale vs. Commonwealth. Record No. 640. From the Corporation Court of the City of Norfolk. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1912.

Lizzie M. Tatterson vs. Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland. Brief of Counsel for Appellant. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (Eugene L. Graves, Inc., Norfolk, VA). [1911]

Lizzie M. Tatterson vs. Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland. Brief of Counsel for Appellee. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1913

Tatterson, Adm’x  &c. vs. Fidelity & Deposit Co., of Maryland. Record 658. From the Court of Law and Chancery of the City of Norfolk. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1912.

Fergus Reid vs. Norfolk Southern Railroad Company, et als. Reply Brief of Counsel for Complainant, on Motion to Dismiss. Supreme Court of North Carolina. (Eugene L. Graves, Inc., Norfolk, VA)

Fergus Reid against Norfolk Southern Railroad Company and others. Brief for Respondents on Motion to Dismiss. Supreme Court of North Carolina. (The Evening Post Job Printing Office, N. Y.)

Fergus Reid vs. Norfolk Southern Railroad Company. Brief of Appellant. Supreme Court of North Carolina. (Eugene L. Graves, Inc., Norfolk, VA) [1913]

Fergus Reid vs. Norfolk Southern Railroad Company, et als. Brief of Counsel for Appellant. In the Superior Court of Wake County, North Carolina, Raleigh. Supreme Court of North Carolina. Annotated.

Fergus Reid against Norfolk Southern Railroad Company and others. Brief for Respondents on Appeal from Decree Sustaining Demurrers. Supreme Court of North Carolina. (The Evening Post Job Printing Office, N.Y.)

Fergus Reid versus Norfolk Southern Railroad Company and others. (From Wake.) No. 238, Sixth District, 1912.

Fergus Reid vs. Norfolk Southern Railroad Company, et als. Reply Brief of Counsel for Appellant. In the Supreme Court of North Carolina. (Eugene L. Graves, Inc., Norfolk, VA)

Fergus Reid against Norfolk Southern Railroad Company and others. Brief for Respondents in Reply on Appeal from Decree Sustaining Demurrers. In the Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Phillips, et al v. City of Portsmouth. Record No. 670. From the Circuit Court of the City of Portsmouth. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1912.

A. J. Phillips and T. J. Wool vs. City of Portsmouth. Brief of Defendant in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (W. A. Fiske, Printer, Portsmouth, Virginia).

A. J. Phillips and T. J. Wool vs. City of Portsmouth. Reply Brief of Plaintiffs in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (W. T. Barron & Co., Norfolk, VA)

Murguiondo v. Nowlan’s Executor et als. Brief of Appellee. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1913.

Murguiondo v. Nowlan’s Ex’or et als. Record No. 661. From the Chancery Court of the City of Richmond. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1912.

Murguiondo v. Nowlan’s Executor, et als. Reply Brief of Counsel for Appellant. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, [1913]

 

Vol. VII

L. W. Tysor and Wife v. Charles E. Adams. Reply Brief on Behalf of Appellants. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, [1911].

L. W. Tysor and Hattie V. Tysor vs. Charles E. Adams, Who Sues, Etc. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond [comments].

L. W. Tysor and Hattie V. Tysor, His Wife v. Charles E. Adams, Who Sues by His Next Friend, C. V. Curtis. Record No. 733. From the Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk, VA. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. Annotated, 1913.

Richardson Construction Co. v. Whiting Lumber Co. Record 752. From the Circuit Court of Norfolk City. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1913.

Libby, McNeil & Libby, a Corporation vs. United States. Reply Brief of Counsel for Plaintiff in Error. United States Circuit of Appeals, Fourth Circuit at Richmond.

Libby, McNeil & Libby, a Corporation vs. United States. Brief of Plaintiff in Error. United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit – Richmond, [1912]

Libby, McNeil & Libby, a Corporation vs. United States. Brief of Defendants in Error. United States Circuit of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, Richmond, [1913]

Libby, McNeil & Libby, a Corporation vs. United States. United States Circuit of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. No. 1174. In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Transcript April, 8, 1913.

Libby, McNeil & Libby, a Corporation vs. United States. United States Circuit of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. No. 1174. In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk, 1913.

Wilhelmina Elizabeth Payne v. Nannie Brown, Adm’x, et als. Record No. 730. From the Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1912.

 

Vol VIII – Missing

 

Vol. IX

General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd. V. Jenny W. Murray.  Record 52. From the Law and Chancery Court of the City of Norfolk, Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1915

General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd. V. Jenny W. Murray. Brief on Behalf of the Defendant-In-Error.  Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. Annotated.

General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd. V. Jenny W. Murray. Reply Brief of Plaintiff-In-Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond.

Israel Kanter v. M. Hofheimer & Company Incorporated. Record No. 62. From the Court of Hustings of the City of Portsmouth. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1915.

Israel Kanter v. M. Hofheimer & Company Incorporated. Brief for Appellee. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond.

Israel Kanter v. M. Hofheimer & Company Incorporated. Reply Brief of Plaintiff in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond.

J. L. Ewell v. Pinkie E. Brock. Record No. 177. From the Circuit Court of Princess Anne County, Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1916.

J. L. Ewell v. Pinkie E. Brock. Record No. 177. Motion in Behalf of Defendant in Error to Bring Up Original Record. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1916.

J. L. Ewell v. Pinkie E. Brock. Reply Brief of Plaintiff in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond. (W. T. Barron & Co., Norfolk).

J. L. Ewell v. Pinkie E. Brock. . Brief of Defendant in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1916.

The Ferries Company, a Corporation v. Albert B. Brown. Record No. 153. From the Circuit Court of the City of Portsmouth. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1915.

The Ferries Company v. Albert B. Brown. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond.

The Ferries Company v. Albert B. Brown. Brief for Defendant in Error. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1916.

 

 

Vol. X – Stein Suit

Stein et al v. Morris et als. Record No 120 From the Circuit Court of Norfolk, Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond, 1915. [Full record with some annotations]

 

Vol. XI – Stein Suit

Industrial Finance Corporation v. Citizens Investment & Loan Company, a corporation, Universal Savings Corporation, Samuel R. Heller, H. B. Frederick, Dan Hunt, E. L. Talman, S. C. French, C. A. Mayo, Paul M. Galloway, J. W. Sloan, J. D. Hall, J. M. Glover.  Brief. In the District Court in and for Tulsa County, Oklahoma.  [undated]

Universal Savings Corporation against The Morris Plan Company of New, et al. (In Equity 12-288.) Defendant’s Brief. United States District Court, for the Southern District of New York. [Undated]

Stein, et als v. Morris, et als. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond [undated]

Stein, et al v. Morris, et al. Brief on Behalf of the Appellee Industrial Finance Corporation. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond.

David Stein, et al v. Arthur J. Morris, Fidelity Corporation of America (A Corporation), and Industrial Finance Corporation (A Corporation). Brief for Appellants. Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia at Richmond.  

Use Policy

Access
Use Restrictions No restrictrions
Preferred Citation
Unless otherwise stated, digital materials in our collections are available for use under a Creative Commons BY 4.0 License (CC-BY-4.0). For Use and Citation guidelines, see Special Collections Use Policy.