Skip to main content

MSS 93-3

Papers of Judge George H. Revercomb

Overview

The papers of Judge George H. Revercomb consist principally of the chambers files from his U.S. district judgeship, 1985-1993.

Language
English
Dates
1942-1993 [Inclusive]
Extents
27 Cubic Feet (50 archival boxes, plus some oversize materials.)

Scope & Contents

The Papers of Judge George H. Revercomb (50 boxes, 20 linear feet) consist of the chambers files for his U.S. district judgeship and memorabilia. They are organized in four groups, maintaining the excellent order imposed in the judge's office. The papers bear witness to Revercomb's reputation as an efficient, hard-working, and well-organized judge.

About a quarter of the collection pertains to personal/professional and administrative matters. In addition to a small amount of personal correspondence, speeches, personnel files, and similar materials, there are log books and detailed calendars of cases, and newsclippings.

The preponderance of cases represented are civil and include the judge's last case,<em>Mergentime Corporation v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority</em>. This lengthy and complicated case involving construction of the District's Metro Green Line was one that Revercomb finished from his hospital bed; he signed the 250-page findings and opinion two days before his death. The majority of the criminal cases in this collection involve drugs. The best-known of them,<em>U.S. v. Williams-Davis</em>, or the R Street Case, was tried in 1991 and involved twenty-two defendants accused of racketeering, drug conspiracy, and drug sales, as well as first-degree murder.

About 280 opinions for the civil cases found in this collection were published, as well as ten opinions for the criminal cases. A database search indicates that about 50 of Revercomb's published cases are not represented in these files.

There are also diplomas, certificates, an oil on canvas portrait, his robe and photographs.

Collection Description

  •  
    Physical Description

    This collection consists of 47 boxes.<extent>1 arbitrary_unit</extent>

  •  
    Conditions Governing Access

    There are no restrictions.

  •  
    Conditions Governing Use

    There are no restrictions.

  •  
    Preferred Citation

    Papers of Judge George H. Revercomb, 1971-1993, MSS 93-3, Box Number, Special Collections, University of Virginia Law Library.

  •  
    Biographical / Historical

    George Hughes Revercomb was born in Charleston, West Virginia, on 3 June 1929. Immediately after graduating from Princeton University with a B.A. in 1950, he started law school at the University of Virginia; however, he left in 1951 to serve for two years as a lieutenant in the Air Force in Korea. Afterward, he returned to the University where he was member of the editorial board of the <em>Virginia Law Review</em>.

    From the time of his law school graduation in 1955 until 1961, Revercomb practiced law in Roanoke at Hazlegrove, Shackelford & Carr, in Charleston, West Virginia, at Revercomb & Price, and in Norfolk at Vanderventer, Black, Meredith and Martin. However, his law practice was interrupted by two years' work in Washington: from 1957 to 1958 in the law department of Southern Railroad, and from 1958 to 1959 at the Federal Communications Commission. By 1962, he was back in Washington practicing law, first by himself and afterward as a partner at Reeves, Harrison, Sams and Revercomb. In 1960, he had married McCall Henderson, of Washington; they eventually made their home in McLean, Virginia.

    In 1969 he joined the Justice Department as an associate deputy attorney general, but left a year later when President Nixon appointed him to the newly formed Superior Court of the District of Columbia. In 1985 President Reagan appointed him to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the seat he held until his death from cancer in 1993.

    Judge Revercomb was a visiting lecturer at the University of Virginia Law School for many years, and was a member of the law school's first class (1982) of judges to receive the LL.M in the Judicial Process. Before he went on the bench, he was active in the Republican party and participated in numerous state and national bar association activities. And in 1970, he was vice-chairman of the U.S. Delegation to the United Nations Conference on Prevention of Crime and Treatment of Offenders in Kyoto, Japan. He was a fellow of the American Bar Foundation, and took an active role in the Judicial Counsel for the D. C. Circuit and the U. S. Judicial Conference.

    Chief Justice William Rehnquist spoke at the dedication of the Revercomb portrait at the D.C. District Courthouse in May of 1994. He recalled his long friendship with the judge and the many evenings he and his wife spent playing bridge with McCall and George Revercomb. Of Revercomb's service on the court Rehnquist said:

    "For him, judging was a calling, just as the ministry is a calling for some. He had always wanted to be a judge. From the time he ascended the bench, as we judges like to put it, until his death last summer, he upheld the very best traditions of the Judiciary."

    What could better illustrate this than his determination, in his final days in the hospital, to complete his decision in the complicated dispute arising out of the construction of the Green Line of the Metro system<emph render="italic">Mergentime Corporation v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transportation Authority</em>, signed on July 30, two days before he died.

    On the occasion of the dedication, two former law clerks spoke of their great admiration and affection for the judge. In Theodore C. Whitehouse's words:

    "Each of us obtained from our service with Judge Revercomb an education about law, service, unwavering adherence to principle, and, above all, a respect for the dignity of every person. We also gained an invaluable friend and mentor who was always there to advise and help whenever he could."

    Revercomb never lost his intense concern for each litigant who appeared before him because, to him, cases were about people, and he wanted to be very sure that the people affected by his decisions were treated fairly and justly. This was especially true where criminal sentencing was concerned.

    Judge Revercomb fulfilled his life-long ambition to be a judge, and carried out that office with honor and distinction to the very end. (860 F. Supp. LXVII -LXXIV)

  •  
    Arrangement

    The papers are arranged in the following groups:

    Administrative Files: personal correspondence, log books, calendars, jury instructions, etc. dating primarily 1985-93; also two notebooks of appellate slip opinions, dating from 1971-84, GHR's years on the D.C. Superior Court. Boxes 1-11

    Civil Case Files: copies of selected court records for about 145 cases that were on the docket in the 1990s; at least 36 of these cases were decided before GHR's death, and his orders or opinions can be found in later boxes. Boxes 12-40

    Decisions in Civil Cases: orders, opinions, a small amount of research material for about 410 cases; arranged alphabetically. Boxes 41-46

    Decisions in Criminal Cases: opinions for 28 cases, arranged alphabetically. Box 46

    Miscellany, including printed material, photographs, caricature of the judge, etc. Box 47

  •  
    Immediate Source of Acquisition

    The Papers of Judge George H. Revercomb were donated to the Law Library by Mrs. McCall H. Revercomb on September 23, 1993.

    Addendum a to the collection was transfered to the archives in 2017 by the estate of Mrs. Revercomb.

    Addendum b was transfered by Paras N. Shah, Chair of the Committee on Archival Preservation of The Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit in 2018.

    Addendum c was donated to the Law Library by Aen Walker Webster, Estate Attorney for McCall H. Revercomb on June 4, 2019

ArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArrayArray
subseriesAdministrative Files
itemCA: 91-1429; ABB FLAKT, Inc. v. A/S NIROMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 90-0490; Alvarado Parkway Institute v. MendezMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 91-1212; American Security Bank v. YorkMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 89-1366; Archuleta v. SullivanMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 85-2493; Averbach v. Sverdrup Corp., et alMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 88-1074; Baird, Jr. v. Paredes, et alMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 86-1117; Banner v. US Dept. of CommerceMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 91-0480; Berger v. Safeway Stores, et alMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 89-1542; Bigelow v. KnightMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemBoggins v. Quilan 88-2796MSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 89-1648; Bridges v. WilliamsMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 91-2731; Building and Construction Trades Dept. v. Reich, Secy of LaborMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 88-0967; Cain, et al v. Bradco Supply CoMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 85-3767; Charles A., et al v. MeeseMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 88-2463; Clipper v. Frank, et alMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 87-1406; Colonial Trading Corp. v. Dept. of the NavyMSS 93-3, Box 43
item87-1406; Connors, Sr. v. Middle Fork CorpMSS 93-3, Box 43
item89-3008; Consumers Union of U.S., Inc. v. Federal Reserve BoardMSS 93-3, Box 43
item85-2228; Cotton v. Buckeye Gas Products CoMSS 93-3, Box 43
item85-1613; Crumpton v. D.C.MSS 93-3, Box 43
item87-0906; Dendy v. U.S. Department of the InteriorMSS 93-3, Box 43
item85-1996; Doe v. Casper Weinberger, Secy of DefenseMSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-1396; Dorsey v. Check, et alMSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-1195; Dudley, Jr. v. USAMSS 93-3, Box 43
item92-1454; EBM Group Corp., LTD. v. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp.MSS 93-3, Box 43
item92-1110; Ellis County, Tx. v. USAMSS 93-3, Box 43
item90-2446; Fairley v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone CoMSS 93-3, Box 43
item86-2014; Fisher v. DunkinMSS 93-3, Box 43
item89-1483; Foundation of Economics Trends v. WalkinsMSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-2639; Fulani v. Brady, Secy of the TreasuryMSS 93-3, Box 43
item87-1259; Gallagher v. QuiggMSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-1801; Georgetown University v. Sportec International v. Tully AssociatesMSS 93-3, Box 43
item85-1582; Globus v. BurnleyMSS 93-3, Box 43
item91-1272; Gould v. Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co. LTDMSS 93-3, Box 43
item92-0147; Graham v. D.C.MSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-0365; Green v. Kinney Shop Corp. [Resolution and clarification]MSS 93-3, Box 43
item86-2356; Hanlon v. American Federation of Government EmployeesMSS 93-3, Box 43
item89-1197; Harmon v. PlautMSS 93-3, Box 43
item90-0845; Healthcare San Antonio, Inc. v. Mendez, Jr. M.DMSS 93-3, Box 43
item91-3149; Henthorn v. Department of the NavyMSS 93-3, Box 43
item90-1050; Hill v. US Parole Commission, et alMSS 93-3, Box 43
item89-2784; Hinton, v. Metropolitan Police Department 5th DistrictMSS 93-3, Box 43
item86-1864; Holt v. ValenciaMSS 93-3, Box 43
item87-2536; Hunter-Bey v. Bureau of Prisons, et alMSS 93-3, Box 43
item86-2881; I.A.M. National Pension Fund v. Pepsico, Inc.MSS 93-3, Box 43
item89-3302; In Re St. Charles Preservation Investors, LTDMSS 93-3, Box 43
item90-3129; International Transcription Services, Inc. v. USA, et alMSS 93-3, Box 43
item87-0363; James Electrical Control, Inc. v. American Insurance CoMSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-1082; Johnson v. QuinlanMSS 93-3, Box 43
item89-2246; Joyce v. Anly Construction Corp.MSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-3218; Kassatly v. Yazbeck, et alMSS 93-3, Box 43
item91-404; Kayfirst Corp. v. Washington Terminal CoMSS 93-3, Box 43
item89-1408; Kennedy v. KennedyMSS 93-3, Box 43
item91-1230; Kenney v. Roland Parson Contracting CoMSS 93-3, Box 43
item90-712; Kirke-Van Orsdel, Inc. et al v. Smith- Sternau Organization, IncMSS 93-3, Box 43
item87-480; Knight v. Department of DefenseMSS 93-3, Box 43
item90-0749; Lawson v. Nevada Power CoMSS 93-3, Box 43
item89-1857; Leeds v. Mosbacher, et alMSS 93-3, Box 43
item87-1506; Lemere v. Burnley, Secy of TransportationMSS 93-3, Box 43
item89-2637; Lipsman d/b/a ADL Financial Services v. Global Environmental Corp.MSS 93-3, Box 43
item87-3032; Lofton v. RoskensMSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-1120; Lu-Ann Bakery Shop, Inc. v. Nelson, Commissioner of INSMSS 93-3, Box 43
item89-1161; Macht, et al v. SkinnerMSS 93-3, Box 44
item90-0377; Magee v. ThornburghMSS 93-3, Box 44
item86-0741; Marine Management, Inc. v. 23' Goliff SailboatMSS 93-3, Box 44
item84-1849; May v. Board of Trustees of the University of D.C.MSS 93-3, Box 44
item88-0398; McAffee v. ReaganMSS 93-3, Box 44
item89-3228; McDaniels v. Howard UniversityMSS 93-3, Box 44
item84-2561; McNeal v. Hi-Lo Powered Scaffolding, IncMSS 93-3, Box 44
item88-2322; Michigan Citizens for an Independent Press, et al v. Attorney General of the USMSS 93-3, Box 44
item89-0095; Mil-Com Electronics Corp. v. Aldridge, Secy of the Air ForceMSS 93-3, Box 44
item88-3573; Moore v. CooperMSS 93-3, Box 44
item90-0440; Montgomery v. HodgesMSS 93-3, Box 44
item87-1147; Napoleon-Bey v. PlautMSS 93-3, Box 44
item86-2686; National Association of Rehabilitation Services, Inc. v. Bowen, Secy of HealthMSS 93-3, Box 44
item89-3394; Nautilius Insurance Co. v. Dolphin Pools Corp, et alMSS 93-3, Box 44
item89-3431; Packer v. Garrett, Secy of the NavyMSS 93-3, Box 44
item89-0387; Payne v. WMATAMSS 93-3, Box 44
item86-0931; Peskowitz v. Mount Vernon Realty, IncMSS 93-3, Box 44
item91-517; Poole v. Smithsonian Museum of Natural History Bookstore, et alMSS 93-3, Box 44
item87-3077; Progressive Cellular Associates, et al v. Monroe, JrMSS 93-3, Box 44
item92-1416; Psychiatric Institute of Washington, D.C. v. Wells, et alMSS 93-3, Box 44
item89-1486; Qadir v. USAMSS 93-3, Box 44
item86-2347; Ragusa v. CarlsonMSS 93-3, Box 44
item90-0348; Reback v. Parsons [Project File]MSS 93-3, Box 45
item88-0279; Retirement & Security Program v. Oglethorpe Power CorpMSS 93-3, Box 45
item89-1041; Richards v. US Merit Systems Protection BoardMSS 93-3, Box 45
item88-0049; Robinson v. CarlucciMSS 93-3, Box 45
item87-2239; Rochon v. US Department of JusticeMSS 93-3, Box 45
item88-0185; Royal Tours v. International Travel Consultants, IncMSS 93-3, Box 45
item88-0692; Rueda Gomez v. ThornburghMSS 93-3, Box 45
item92-0517; Saleh v. BraxtonMSS 93-3, Box 45
item89-1850; Schaefer v. Cheney, et alMSS 93-3, Box 45
item88-0727; Secord v. CockburnMSS 93-3, Box 45
item87-1491; Shamey v. Administrator, General Services AdministrationMSS 93-3, Box 45
item90-1724; Silvas v. WMATAMSS 93-3, Box 45
item92-0022; Simpson v. D.C. Metropolitan PoliceMSS 93-3, Box 45
item87-1452; Smallwood v. D.C. Board of ParoleMSS 93-3, Box 45
item89-2073; Sorrells v. Elli Lilly & CoMSS 93-3, Box 45
item89-0464; SRS Technologies Corp. v. Department of Air ForceMSS 93-3, Box 45
item92-0042; Stone v. Williams & ConnollyMSS 93-3, Box 45
item89-2074; Survival Technology v. MarshMSS 93-3, Box 45
item92-0144; Tao v. SessionsMSS 93-3, Box 45
item92-1971; Thomas v. BraxtonMSS 93-3, Box 45
item86-2850; Thomas v. SchultzMSS 93-3, Box 45
item91-0011; Vithoven v. ThussMSS 93-3, Box 45
item92-2864; USA v. Airline Tariff Publishing Co.MSS 93-3, Box 45
item88-0083; USA v. JackMSS 93-3, Box 46
item84-3169; Viehe v. SchoolsMSS 93-3, Box 46
item88-1922; Wagner Seed Co, Inc. v. BushMSS 93-3, Box 46
item90-0356; Walsh v. The Dun & BradstreetMSS 93-3, Box 46
item91-1638; Washington Hospital Center Corp. v. WatersMSS 93-3, Box 46
item85-2140; Wemhaff v. Tramps Management, Inc.MSS 93-3, Box 46
item85-1400; Willens v. National Security CouncilMSS 93-3, Box 46
item88-0004; Young v. Secy of HealthMSS 93-3, Box 46
seriesMSS 93-3, Papers of Judge George H. Revercomb, 1971 - 1993
Revercomb, Judge George H.
Sorrell, Clyde H.
subseriesCivil Case Files
itemCA: 89-1892; Abramson, et al v. Frank, et alMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 90-2084; Allen v. US Capitol PoliceMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 87-1806; American Fed. of Government Employees v. Calhoun, et alMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 87-2942; Anchorena v. District of ColumbiaMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 88-2600; Assassination Archives and Research Center v. CIAMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 86-0497; Automated Services, Inc. v. Dept. of JusticeMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 87-530; Baker v. Meese, et alMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 87-1072; Barksdale v. Washington Terminal CoMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 90-1689; Berlacher v. Painewebber, IncMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 88-1052; Black v. Braxton, et alMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemBowman v. T. Rowe Price Associates 86-2208MSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 92-2416; Brown v. BarrMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 89-2731; Burgess v. SullivanMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 89-0850; Carolina v. Kaiser Foundation and Office and Professional Employees International EmployeesMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 89-3469; Clark v. HarpMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 91-0349; Coast Federal Savings Bank v. Director, Office of Thrift SupervisionMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 89-0359; Cohen v. US Dept. of the Air ForceMSS 93-3, Box 43
item89-0359; Connors, Sr. v. Barrick Gold ExplorationMSS 93-3, Box 43
item86-3390; Cooley v. U.S. Parole CommissionMSS 93-3, Box 43
item90-0340; Cox v. Secy of LaborMSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-1008; Cunningham v. United National Bank of Washington, et alMSS 93-3, Box 43
itemD'Angelo v. U.S. Attorney General 91-1527MSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-1538; Dennis v. Meese, III et alMSS 93-3, Box 43
item89-2019; Dole v. National Alliance of Postal and Federal EmployeesMSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-0437; Dover Administrative Services v. Riggs National BankMSS 93-3, Box 43
item90-2704; Durnan v. US Department of CommerceMSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-2529; Edens v. Musolino, et alMSS 93-3, Box 43
item89-2181; Emory v. Psychiatric Institutes of AmericaMSS 93-3, Box 43
item86-0931; Farmer v. Mount Vernon Realty, IncMSS 93-3, Box 43
item85-0346; Flanagan v. Columbialand Ventures, IncMSS 93-3, Box 43
item91-1856; Franklin Asaph Limited Partnership v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.MSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-3203; Fergussin v. D.C. Metropolitan Police DepartmentMSS 93-3, Box 43
item90-0981; Garcia, et al v. Yeutter, et alMSS 93-3, Box 43
item91-1797; Germany v. Operating Engineers Trust Fund of Washington, D.CMSS 93-3, Box 43
item85-1582; Globus v. DoleMSS 93-3, Box 43
item85-0924; Gordan v. TishMSS 93-3, Box 43
item92-0289; Green v. Resolution Trust Corp.MSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-1926; Green v. Secretary of the TreasuryMSS 93-3, Box 43
item91-1599; Hanson v. GrennspanMSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-1181; Hartman v. MetpathMSS 93-3, Box 43
item91-1356; Henderson v. Lujan, Secy of the InteriorMSS 93-3, Box 43
item90-2943; Henthorn v. National Transportation Safety BoardMSS 93-3, Box 43
item90-0897; Hill v. US Board of ParoleMSS 93-3, Box 43
item89-1466; Hockman v. USA v. Dawson BrothersMSS 93-3, Box 43
item86-2524; Hudnell v. Co-Op Investement BankersMSS 93-3, Box 43
item85-2901; Hurd v. New England Mutual Life Insurance CoMSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-3440; IBM Credit Corp. v. Railing Corp. v. Hayman ConstructionMSS 93-3, Box 43
item87-0916; Institute for Policy Studies v. Department of Air ForceMSS 93-3, Box 43
item90-0066; ITPE-MEBA/NMU FUNDS v. United International Investigative ServicesMSS 93-3, Box 43
itemJenkins v. Leventhal 89-3318MSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-3003; Johnson v. USAMSS 93-3, Box 43
item87-1894; Joyce v. Clyde Sandoz Masonry ContractorsMSS 93-3, Box 43
item87-765; Kasmir v. Carey International, IncMSS 93-3, Box 43
item90-0149; Kearing, et al v. Guinee, et alMSS 93-3, Box 43
item90-1310; Kenner v. US Parole Commission, et alMSS 93-3, Box 43
item87-2868; Khan v. Hershman, et alMSS 93-3, Box 43
item92-0076; Kirkland, et al v. District of ColumbiaMSS 93-3, Box 43
item89-0548; Knox v. USA, et alMSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-2220; Lawrence v. BraxtonMSS 93-3, Box 43
item89-1925; Leeds v. QuiggMSS 93-3, Box 43
item90-0592; Lewis v. StempsonMSS 93-3, Box 43
item89-1266; Lisee v. CIAMSS 93-3, Box 43
item87-2652; Lombardo v. USA Department of JusticeMSS 93-3, Box 43
item86-1970; Loveless v. Armstrong World IndustriesMSS 93-3, Box 43
item85-1959; Lufkin v. Director, Executive Office for the US AttorneysMSS 93-3, Box 43
item90-0095; MacPherson v. Searle & Co. & MeckMSS 93-3, Box 44
item88-1568; Makel v. Williams, et alMSS 93-3, Box 44
item90-1596; Martin v. StoneMSS 93-3, Box 44
item89-1003; MBC International Contractors, Inc. v. Republic of Trinidad and TobagoMSS 93-3, Box 44
item87-1256; McCarter v. BowenMSS 93-3, Box 44
item85-3083; Mc Duffus v. USAMSS 93-3, Box 44
item87-1266; Meisel Rohrbau GmBH & Co. v. Department of the ArmyMSS 93-3, Box 44
item87-3322; Milam v. Justice DepartmentMSS 93-3, Box 44
item87-1204; Miller v. Amalgamated Casualty CoMSS 93-3, Box 44
item89-2526; Monleone v. Sullivan, Secy of HealthMSS 93-3, Box 44
item89-0293; Morabito v. BeggianiMSS 93-3, Box 44
item85-0214; Nathan v. WMATAMSS 93-3, Box 44
item87-1540; National Bank of Washington v. AkhavanMSS 93-3, Box 44
item87-1833; Nelson v. US Department of Justice, FBI, et alMSS 93-3, Box 44
item87-0979; Pederson v. Leroy, et alMSS 93-3, Box 44
item91-1689; Pettiford v. D.C., et alMSS 93-3, Box 44
item85-0822; Potomac Valley Brick v. Gibbons, et alMSS 93-3, Box 44
item86-0263; Prost v. Thrifty Rent-A-Car System, Inc. et alMSS 93-3, Box 44
item86-1787; Public Citizen, et al v. Burke, Acting Archivist, National ArchivesMSS 93-3, Box 44
item88-1999; Quality Brands, Inc. v. Marion BarryMSS 93-3, Box 44
item87-0075; Ransom v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber CoMSS 93-3, Box 44
item89-0348; Rees v. Family Activities CenterMSS 93-3, Box 45
item84-0933; Reuber v. Stauffer Chemical CoMSS 93-3, Box 45
item91-2805; Richburg v. The Times Journal CoMSS 93-3, Box 45
item88-2903; Robinson v. Garrett, IIIMSS 93-3, Box 45
item91-2998; Rodriguez v. Resolution Trust CorpMSS 93-3, Box 45
item91-0608; Ryan v. BradyMSS 93-3, Box 45
item91-1891; Sabin v. Regardie, Regardie & BartowMSS 93-3, Box 45
item87-2298; Schalk v. ReaganMSS 93-3, Box 45
item90-2534; Sen-Tung v. USAMSS 93-3, Box 45
item88-2932; Shamloo v. Lifespring, IncMSS 93-3, Box 45
item88-2106; Simmons v. BillingtonMSS 93-3, Box 45
item91-1962; Singletary v. Nicholas InnerbichlerMSS 93-3, Box 45
item91-1187; Smith v. QuinlanMSS 93-3, Box 45
item90-1868; Southern Technologies, Inc. v. USAMSS 93-3, Box 45
item87-2245; Stanley v. PlautMSS 93-3, Box 45
item86-1057; Strang v. US Arms Control & Disarmament AgencyMSS 93-3, Box 45
item88-0146; Swisher v. SchneidermanMSS 93-3, Box 45
item90-1357; Tate v. BurkeMSS 93-3, Box 45
item86-0941; Thomas v. General Services AdministrationMSS 93-3, Box 45
item92-413; Tobey v. National Labor Relations BoardMSS 93-3, Box 45
item88-2480; Unimed, Inc. v. QuiggMSS 93-3, Box 45
item91-2502; USA v. Becon Services Corp. & Aetna CasualtyMSS 93-3, Box 45
item91-155; USA v. TimmelMSS 93-3, Box 46
item85-3208; Vietnam Veterans of America v. Secy of the NavyMSS 93-3, Box 46
item88-3385; Walden v. BushMSS 93-3, Box 45
item90-1669; Warriner v. US Marshalls Service, et alMSS 93-3, Box 46
item88-3652; D.W.S. Washington Holdings, Inc. v. JacksonMSS 93-3, Box 46
item91-2751; Western Residential, Inc. v. Resolution Trust Corp.MSS 93-3, Box 46
item88-1901; Williams v. WMATAMSS 93-3, Box 46
item86-1552; Young v. Martin Marietta AerospaceMSS 93-3, Box 46
seriesMSS 93-3a, Addendum to the Papers of Judge George H. Revercomb--Memorabilia, 1944 - 1993
subseriesCivil Cases-Opinions, Orders, Etc.
itemCA: 88-0484; Adams, et al v. Dyna Span Corp.MSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 89-2057; Avins v. Cavazos, et alMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 89-0661; American Libray Association v. Thornbugh, Attorney GeneralMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 90-0464; Anderson v. District of ColumbiaMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 88-829; Association of Business Publishers v. US Postal ServiceMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 89-2057; Avins, et al v. Cavazos, et alMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 90-2934; Bank St. Croix v. Federal Deposit InsuranceMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 91-0262; Beale, et al v. District of ColumbiaMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 86-1701; Berton v. PlautMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 86-2187; Black v. Turnage, et alMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemBradley v. Melrose Co. 90-1676MSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 88-0565; Brown v. Marion Barry, et alMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 88-0623; Burress v. Hilton Hotels Corp.MSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 88-0292; Caldwell v. QuinlanMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 85-1455; Castorr v. Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc.MSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 90-3048; Cleveland Clinic Foundation v. SullivanMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 88-2608; Coates v. D.C.MSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 88-3670; Colonial Penn Insurance Co. v. OwensMSS 93-3, Box 43
item86-0299; Connors, Sr. v. Island Creek Coal, CoMSS 93-3, Box 43
item91-3390; Copeland v. MorrisMSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-2496; Crawford Fitting Co. v. Secy of the NavyMSS 93-3, Box 43
item90-1517; Datacard Corp. v. Kunz KG. Kunz & Digital v. DatacardMSS 93-3, Box 43
item86-1043; Dennis v. Montedonico, et alMSS 93-3, Box 43
item90-0614; Dorman v. Thornburgh, et alMSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-0241; Edmond v. USA Postal ServiceMSS 93-3, Box 43
item89-0674; Epperly v. State of Alaska, et alMSS 93-3, Box 43
item89-0333; Federal Loan Mortgage Corp. v. Park Monroe Limited, et alMSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-2866; Fletcher v. BraxtonMSS 93-3, Box 43
item90-1062; Frazier v. University of D.C., et alMSS 93-3, Box 43
item86-0432; Garnett v. US Soldiers & Airmen's HomeMSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-1820; Gersman, et al v. Group Health Association, IncMSS 93-3, Box 43
item85-1582; Globus v. SkinnerMSS 93-3, Box 43
item86-2507; Gordon v. Warner CorpMSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-2158; Greenpeace USA, et al v. MosbacherMSS 93-3, Box 43
item91-1579; Hardbower v. Zuckerman, Spalder, GoldsteinMSS 93-3, Box 43
item86-1350; Hastings Condominium Association v. National Bank of WashingtonMSS 93-3, Box 43
item90-2858; Henthorn v. Lawn, et alMSS 93-3, Box 43
item90-1703; Holland v. Board of Trustees of University of D.CMSS 93-3, Box 43
item86-1864; Hunter v. MeeseMSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-2585; Ingram v. First American BankMSS 93-3, Box 43
item91-1699; International Brotherhood of Painters & Allied Trades Union v. Rose Brothers Home Decorating Center, IncMSS 93-3, Box 43
itemJohnson v. Greater Southeast Community Hospital Corp. 90-1992MSS 93-3, Box 43
item87-2517; Kaushiva v. Board of Trustees of the University of D.C., et alMSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-1500; King v. KaoMSS 93-3, Box 43
item90-0251; Kleiman v. USA Department of EnergyMSS 93-3, Box 43
item85-1169; Kreis v. Secy of the AIr ForceMSS 93-3, Box 43
item87-0977; Lee v. BradyMSS 93-3, Box 43
item91-1345; Lockley v. Chao, Director of Peace CorpsMSS 93-3, Box 43
item87-2196; Lowry v. ReganMSS 93-3, Box 43
item89-0521; Males v. SullivanMSS 93-3, Box 44
item86-3210; Mathis-Bay v. US Attorney GeneralMSS 93-3, Box 44
item88-1933; McAffee v. Clerk of the Supreme Court SpagnoloMSS 93-3, Box 44
item90-2365; McCullough v. McPhersonMSS 93-3, Box 44
item85-2890; McGovern v. AIWA America, et alMSS 93-3, Box 44
item87-3431; Milam v. HarpsMSS 93-3, Box 44
item90-409; Miller v. Baker, Secy of StateMSS 93-3, Box 44
item90-2714; Montalvo, Cordero, Matsuzaki v. Thornburgh, Attorney GeneralMSS 93-3, Box 44
item89-0009; Mueller v. US District Court of PennMSS 93-3, Box 44
item86-0866; National Association of Letter Carriers, AFL-CIO v. ReaganMSS 93-3, Box 44
item88-0485; National Marine Engineers' Beneficial Association v. Burnley, et alMSS 93-3, Box 44
item86-1926; New York State Ophthalmological Society, et al v. BowenMSS 93-3, Box 44
item86-3294; Patlex Corp. v. QuiggMSS 93-3, Box 44
item87-2127; Pennsylvania Ave. Development Corp. v. One Parcel in D.C., Herman, Heck, et alMSS 93-3, Box 44
item89-2529; Pittman v. RidleyMSS 93-3, Box 44
item88-1850; Potter, III v. Department of the NavyMSS 93-3, Box 44
item85-3527; Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Baskin & Steingut, P.C, et alMSS 93-3, Box 44
item87-0021; Rao v. USA Agency for International DevelopmentMSS 93-3, Box 44
item88-897; Reeve Aleutian Airways v. USA, et alMSS 93-3, Box 45
item90-0249; Ricks v. SimonsMSS 93-3, Box 45
item86-931; Robinson v. Mount Vernon Realty CoMSS 93-3, Box 45
item89-2218; Rogers v. Nathan, et alMSS 93-3, Box 45
item88-3661; Sanders v. H & M EnterprisesMSS 93-3, Box 45
item90-2505; Schlick v. SullivanMSS 93-3, Box 45
item87-0906; Sergeant Dendy v. US Department of InteriorMSS 93-3, Box 45
item87-2799; Silvions v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsMSS 93-3, Box 45
item89-2853; Simmons v. FulwoodMSS 93-3, Box 45
item90-1968; Slaughter v. Allright Parking, IncMSS 93-3, Box 45
item89-2386; Smith v. SullivanMSS 93-3, Box 45
item91-999; Southland Corp. v. GodetteMSS 93-3, Box 45
item90-0159; Stephen Kovacs v. ThornburghMSS 93-3, Box 45
item89-3300; Summers v. US Department of JusticeMSS 93-3, Box 45
item87-863; Skyes v. D.C.MSS 93-3, Box 45
item87-1606; Thomas v. Baker, IIIMSS 93-3, Box 45
item89-2068; Thomas v. Saint Elizabeth's HospitalMSS 93-3, Box 45
item86-3222; Tompkins v. Standard Federal Savings & Loan AssociationMSS 93-3, Box 45
item92-0742; United Mine Workers of America International Union v. Arch Mineral Corp.MSS 93-3, Box 45
item87-3289; Valentine v. USAMSS 93-3, Box 46
item89-0085; Walden v. 100th Congress of the USMSS 93-3, Box 46
item87-0512; Waschitzki v. Vista International [D.C.]MSS 93-3, Box 46
item92-2074; Washington Tour Guides Association v. National Park ServiceMSS 93-3, Box 46
item91-5497; Wiley v. BowenMSS 93-3, Box 46
item87-2774; WMATA v. One ParcelMSS 93-3, Box 46
item89-2227; Young v. SullivanMSS 93-3, Box 46
seriesMSS 93-3b, Addendum to the Papers of George H. Revercomb--Memorabilia, 1942 - 1993
subseriesCriminal Cases--Opinions, Orders, Etc.
itemCA: 85-2229; Ago v. Begg, Inc. et alMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 91-0220; Alley et al v. Aristeguita, et alMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 92-2317; American Mopac International v. Cheney, Secy of DefenseMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 92-1215; Anderson v. NiklasMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 86-2925; Association of National Health Service Corp. Scholarship Recipients v. BowenMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 88-1363; Banks v. District of ColumbiaMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA; 91-0592; Bell v. Colonial Parking, IncMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 87-1995; Bias v. Advantage InternationalMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 87-2618; Block v. Pitney Bowes, Inc.MSS 93-3, Box 41
itemBraxton v. U.S. Parole Commission 87-3339MSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 89-1676; Brown v. US Government, et alMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 90-2963; Bush v. Charles Smith Co.MSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 89-0357; Calvin Klein Industries v. Lawrence & AthanasiosMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 90-2854; Chacon v. DEAMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 88-3563; Clift, et al v. CliftMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 90-0679; Coates v. WMATAMSS 93-3, Box 41
itemCA: 88-3430; Committee in Solidarity with the People of El Salvador v. Sessions, et alMSS 93-3, Box 43
item87-0784; Corbett v. PalmerMSS 93-3, Box 43
item87-0784; Corbett v. PalmerMSS 93-3, Box 43
item89-1170; Crucible Materials Corp. v. Sumitomo Special Metals Co., LTDMSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-3691; Delgado v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsMSS 93-3, Box 43
item85-3528; D.C. Common Cause v. D.C. & RiversMSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-1396; Dorsey v. Cavazos, Secy of EducationMSS 93-3, Box 43
item85-2347; Edwards v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance CoMSS 93-3, Box 43
item91-356; First American Bank, NA. v. Corby-Lynn Real State CoMSS 93-3, Box 43
item86-2297; Fong v. US Department of the TreasuryMSS 93-3, Box 43
item90-3041; Frye v. US Enviromental Protection AgencyMSS 93-3, Box 43
item86-0431; G.C. Services Corp. v. USAMSS 93-3, Box 43
item84-2954; Geske v. Attorney GeneralMSS 93-3, Box 43
item87-1353; Grant v. BullockMSS 93-3, Box 43
item88-1766; Harmon v. MeeseMSS 93-3, Box 43
item90-3116; Henthorn v. Quinlan, et alMSS 93-3, Box 43
item92-2009; Kuntz v. New York State Board of ElectionsMSS 93-3, Box 43
item87-3429; Milam v. WadeMSS 93-3, Box 44
item91-2158; Munn v. USAMSS 93-3, Box 44
item89-2404; Nunez v. S/T Evmits Navigating CoMSS 93-3, Box 44
item87-0883; Pringle v. Howard UniversityMSS 93-3, Box 44
item90-2078; Roberts v. SmithMSS 93-3, Box 45
item92-2049; Robinson v. SutterMSS 93-3, Box 45
item88-3277; Rowe v. Kidd & Congressional Quaterly, IncMSS 93-3, Box 45
item91-632; Resolution Trust Corp. v. BildamMSS 93-3, Box 45
item91-912; Sawyer v. PorrecaMSS 93-3, Box 45
item91-2838; Scott v. US Parole CommissionMSS 93-3, Box 45
item88-533; Secord v. WheatonMSS 93-3, Box 45
item92-0391; Silva v. USAMSS 93-3, Box 45
item88-3493; Simmons v. Kora & Williams CorpMSS 93-3, Box 45
item85-2736; Slater v. QuiggMSS 93-3, Box 45
item88-2360; Solaris International Corp. v. Hacker-Pschoorr Bran GMBHMSS 93-3, Box 45
item89-0480; Spergel v. Dolphin Pools CorpMSS 93-3, Box 45
item90-1157; Steinberger v. Sun Refining & Marketing CoMSS 93-3, Box 45
item86-3230; Summers v. US Department of StateMSS 93-3, Box 45
item88-1932; Thomas v. D.C.MSS 93-3, Box 45
item86-2605; Thomas v. WMATAMSS 93-3, Box 45
item90-1658; Thompson v. USAMSS 93-3, Box 45
item87-1705; Vance v. American Security BankMSS 93-3, Box 46
item92-1405; Walker v. American National Red CrossMSS 93-3, Box 46
item89-0784; Washington-El v. ThornburghMSS 93-3, Box 46
item89-1385; Whatley v. Marion BarryMSS 93-3, Box 46
item88-1924; Williams v. D.C. Board of ParoleMSS 93-3, Box 46
item87-0115; Yuen v. Emmitt Ross Melvin, et alMSS 93-3, Box 46
seriesMSS 93-3c, Addendum to the Papers of George H. Revercomb--Memorabilia
subseriesMiscellany
itemCA: 87-3425; Butler v. WMATA, et alMSS 93-3, Box 41
item90-1504; Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee v. Federal Election CommissionMSS 93-3, Box 43
item89-0448; Simmons v. Marsh, JrMSS 93-3, Box 45
item88-2795; Stiglich v. Tracks, D.C., IncMSS 93-3, Box 45
item86-1105; Staudinger, P.C. v. Lotus Scientific DevelopmentMSS 93-3, Box 45
item87-3083; State Department Federal Credit Union v. The Gas Screw Vessel "Selina II'MSS 93-3, Box 45
English