View digitized materials associated with this collection.
View the full archival record in the UVA ArchivesSpace portal.
Collection of more than hundred letters related to the Alabama claims cases written to William W. Crapo, a lawyer in New Bedford, Massachusetts from 1870 - 1876. The correspondence provides a detailed view of the lawyers’ legal and political efforts to secure restitution for their clients.
There are no restrictions.
After the Civil War, the United States sought restitution from Great Britain which, despite its neutrality, had allowed Confederate cruisers bent on destroying U.S. commerce to come and go from its ports during the war. The U.S. government and private citizens claimed millions of dollars of damage and loss at the hand of these cruisers. The Treaty of Washington, signed by the U.S. and Britain in early 1871, among other things, provided for arbitration of these claims. In the fall of that year, representatives of the two countries went to Geneva to argue their cases before an international arbitration tribunal, the first of its kind. The United States' case was argued by former Assistant Secretary of State Bancroft Davis, along with lawyers Caleb Cushing, William M. Evarts, and Morrison R. Waite, under the direction of Secretary of State Hamilton Fish and Secretary of Treasury George Boutwell. On the tribunal were Charles Francis Adams representing the U.S., Chief Justice Sir Alexander Cockburn of Great Britain, along with arbitrators from Brazil, Italy, and Switzerland. At the conclusion, Great Britain agreed to pay the U.S. the $15,500,000 (£3,200,00) awarded by the tribunal to cover the depredations of the cruisers
Bancroft Davis and members of the cabinet had originally hoped to recover far more from Great Britain than the amount of loss directly attributable to the cruisers. They had wanted to hold the British liable for losses in commerce, hikes in insurance rates, and even the general costs of a protracted war. The tribunal was not sympathetic to this side of the U.S. case, and subsequently, individual claimants feared that the government would try to withhold some of the award for the ailing treasury. Congress, however, favored the claimants and, soon after the arbitration award was made, established a Court of Commissioners of Alabama Claims in Washington to handle individuals' cases.
The letters in this collection were written to William W. Crapo, a lawyer in New Bedford, Massachusetts. Crapo, educated at Yale College and Harvard Law School, began practicing law when he was twenty-five. That same year he became city solicitor and the following year, representative to the General Court. He was also active in politics, serving three terms in Congress and running unsuccessfully several times as the Republican candidate for governor of Massachusetts. By Crapo's fortieth year, 1870, when this correspondence begins, he was a prominent figure in legal, business, and political circles in his state. Along with other New Bedford lawyers Charles R. Tucker and George C. Crocker, Crapo was beginning to prepare claims for a number of New England "Sufferers," principally whalers, who had lost property to or incurred damage because of the Confederate cruisers' actions. In addition, Crapo worked closely with New York lawyers Henry A. Barling and A. H. Davis, who were partners, as well as Charles C. Beaman, Jr.
Beaman, formerly private secretary to Massachusetts Senator Charles Sumner, published
This collection consists of 1 archival box of over one hundred letters.
Correspondence of William W. Crapo Concerning the Alabama Claims Cases, 1870-1876, MSS-98-3, University of Virginia Law Library, Charlottesville, VA 22903
This collection consists of over one hundred letters concerning the Alabama claims cases. Written to William Crapo between 1870 and 1876, the letters provide a detailed view of the lawyers' legal and political efforts to secure restitution for their clients. Crapo's principal correspondents were lawyers Barling and Davis who wrote him over fifty letters between December of 1870 and February of 1873. Of particular interest are the letters written in late 1872 regarding the lawyers' efforts to influence members of the administration and Congress to ensure that the full award went to the claimants. The names of George Boutwell, Caleb Cushing, Bancroft Davis, William Evarts, Hamilton Fish, Ulysses Grant, among others, appear in their letters to Crapo. Additional correspondents include other lawyers working on similar cases, bankers, insurance officials, and individuals, some poor and poorly educated, who had suffered great losses.
There are no restrictions.