1792–1793
SuccessionDebtCreditorAlimentTackCautionerAlexander Bruce pursued the representatives of John Stein for a debt arising from a 1770 bond involving Robert Stein, with trustees and spouses' portions also forming part of the dispute. The defenders resisted the action, leading Bruce and his trustee Alexander Abercromby to argue that the defenders, as representatives of the deceased John Stein, remained liable for the bond obligation.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- Alexander Bruce v. Andrew Stein — Information, 5 Mar 1792Defenders, including heirs of John Stein, defend against Alexander Bruce’s claim for debt from a 1770 bond involving Robert Stein, with trustees and spouses’ portions at issue.
- Alexander Bruce v. Andrew Stein — Information, 11 Oct 1792October 11, 1792 Information of Alexander Bruce of Kennet and Alexander Abercromby, Writer to the Signet, his Trustee, arguing that defenders are representatives of deceased John Stein and liable for bond obligation
People & places in this case
People involved
- Robert Stein — Party
- Robert Bruce, of Kennet, Lord Kennet — Party
- James Stein — Party
- James Turnbull — Party
- Allan Maconochie, Lord Meadowbank — Advocate for Party
- Sir James Fergusson, of Kilkerran, Lord Kilkerran — Lord Ordinary
Places
Where this case took place
Published Reports
William Morison, The Decisions of the Court of Session (1811), pg. 11033
| The information regarding this case was derived from an import courteously provided by the Baillii Database of Scottish Court of Session Decisions. In terms of the SCOS project, this databases uses respective BAILII entries as metadata shells for case materials present in the SCOS project partners respective repositories. |
