1795–1796
The Reverend Mr. James Bannerman, as executor of Mrs Beatrix Goldie, petitioned the Court to overturn an interlocutor ordering him to condescend on a bond granted by his late husband. David Shaw of Jamaica and his attorney Alexander Ritchie answered, responding to claims under a bond dated 1771. Bannerman then petitioned to alter the interlocutor and be assoilzied, whereupon Shaw and Ritchie answered again, this time responding to the claim for a bond due from Bannerman’s late uncle Patrick Bannerman.AI-generated
Documents in this case (4)
- Bannerman v. Shaw and Ritchie — Petition, 30 Jun 1795June 30, 1795 Petition of the Rev. Mr. James Bannerman asking the Court to overturn the interlocutor ordering him to condescend on the bond granted by his late husband
- David Shaw v. James Bannerman — Answers, 2 Jan 1796January 2, 1796 Answers by David Shaw of Jamaica and Alexander Ritchie, his attorney, to the petition of Rev. Mr James Bannerman, executor of Mrs Beatrix Goldie, responding to claims under a bond dated 1771.
- Bannerman v. Shaw and Ritchie — Petition, 17 Feb 1796February 17, 1796 Petition of the Rev. Mr. James Bannerman, asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor and assoilzie him
- Rev. Mr. Bannerman v. David Shaw — Answers, 7 Apr 1796April 7, 1796 Answers by David Shaw and Alex Ritchie to the petition of Rev. Mr. James Bannerman, responding to the claim for a bond due from his late uncle Patrick Bannerman.
