1832
InterlocutorSuspensionExpensesAdjudicationSistCorporationCuninghams & Bell, W.S., asked the Court to allow them to sist themselves as parties in the suspension between pursuer John Boyd and defender George Cunninghame, seeking to repeat the interlocutor in their favour. Based on the single document cataloged for this case.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- John Boyd v. George Cunninghame — Notes, 22 Feb 1832February 22, 1832 Note of Cuninghams & Bell, W.S., asking the Court to allow them to sist themselves as parties in the suspension between John Boyd and George Cunninghame, to repeat the interlocutor in their favour.
- Reclaiming Petition — Rec. Note—John Boyd against Lord Craigie's InterlocutorSeptember 6, 1832 Reclaiming Petition of John Boyd, against Lord Craigie's interlocutor
People & places in this case
People involved
- John Boyd — Party
- Adam Anderson — Party
- Andrew Skene — Advocate for Party
- Archibald Boyd, M.A. — Advocate for Party
- George Rose — Advocate for Party
- Sir James Moncreiff, Lord Moncreiff — Lord Ordinary
- Allan Maconochie, Lord Meadowbank — Lord Ordinary
Places
- Linlithgow (principal)
- Edinburgh
