1788
DebtInterlocutorCreditOathCautionContractJames Duguid petitioned the Court to alter the Lord Ordinary’s interlocutor and suspend the letters simpliciter issued against him, challenging the enforcement of a Magistrates’ decree. John Hall, John Tenant, and William Sprott answered, asserting that the Magistrates’ decree had been properly enforced and the petitioner’s claims were groundless.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- Duguid v. Hall, et al — Petition, 26 Jan 1788January 26, 1788 Petition of James Duguid asking the Court to alter the Lord Ordinary's interlocutor and suspend the letters simpliciter
- James Duguid v. John Hall, John Tenant and William Sprott — Answers, 14 Feb 1788February 14, 1788 Answers by John Hall, John Tenant, and William Sprott to the petition of James Duguid, asserting that the petitioner's claims are groundless and that the Magistrates' decree was properly enforced.
People & places in this case
People involved
- William Sprott — Party
- John Dickson, of Kilbucho — Advocate for Party
- John Swinton, Lord Swinton — Lord Ordinary
