1793–1794
TeindsValuationRentHeritorTackInterlocutorDocuments in this case (2)
- Thomson — Petition, 4 Jan 1793January 4, 1793 Memorial of the petitioner, arguing that fishing profits must be included in the rental as they constitute payment in consideration of the fruits of the ground
- Sir Thomas Dundas v. David Thomson — Answers, 14 Jan 1794January 14, 1794 Petition of the respondent arguing that the case falls to be determined independent entirely of the general question of teind valuation
People & places in this case
People involved
- Sir Lawrence Dundas — Party
- Charles Hay, of Newton, Lord Newton — Advocate for Party
- Sir James Fergusson, of Kilkerran, Lord Kilkerran — Lord Ordinary
