1796
CreditorAdjudicationInterlocutorRanking of CreditorsRanking and SaleDiligenceMr Johnston of Carnfalloch petitioned the Court to alter an interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary that postponed his interest in the ranking, on the basis that the adjudication had been led after certification. The respondents answered, disputing the argument that an adjudication obtained after certification should be ranked with preference.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- Dunn v. Johnston, et al — Petition, 15 Jan 1796January 15, 1796 Petition of Mr Johnston of Carnfalloch asking the Court to alter the Lord Ordinary's interlocutor which postponed his interest in the ranking due to an adjudication led after certification
- Representatives of John Dunn v. Peter Johnston — Answers, 12 Feb 1796February 12, 1796 Answers by the respondents to the petitioners' argument that an adjudication obtained after certification should be ranked with preference
People & places in this case
People involved
- Peter Johnston, of Carnsalloch — Party
- John Lang — Advocate for Party
- Matthew Montgomery — Advocate for Party
- William Baillie, Lord Polkemmet — Lord Ordinary
- James Burnett, Lord Monboddo — Lord Ordinary
