1786–1787
Feu dutiesTeindsWadsetReversionDispositionIntromissionGeorge Neilson, Benjamin Sinclair, and other creditors of Robert Manson-Sinclair of Bridge-end pursued Mrs Henrietta Sinclair, Janet Sinclair, and their husbands regarding debts owed by the debtor, petitioning the Court to alter Lord Ankerville's interlocutor of 9 August 1786. The defenders answered the petition, responding to the creditors' claims against Robert Manson-Sinclair.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- Neilson, et al v. Sinclairs — Petition, 22 Nov 1786November 22, 1786 Petition of George Neilson, Benjamin Sinclair, and others, creditors of Robert Manson-Sinclair of Bridge-end, asking the Court to alter Lord Ankerville's interlocutor of August 9.
- George Neilson, Benjamin Sinclair, and others v. Mrs Henrietta and Janet Sinclairs — Answers, 25 Jan 1787January 25, 1787 Answers by Mrs Henrietta and Janet Sinclairs and their husbands to the petition of George Neilson and others, responding to claims of creditors against Robert Manson-Sinclair.
People & places in this case
People involved
- George Neilson — Party
- John Campbell, Lord Stonefield — Party
- Margaret Ross — Party
- Major-General John Scott, of Balcomie — Party
- David Henderson, Clerk — Party
- Lieutenant-Colonel Charles Maclean, 6th of Drimnin and Kinlochaline — Party
- George Wallace — Advocate for Party
- Sir James Fergusson, of Kilkerran, Lord Kilkerran — Lord Ordinary
Places
- Caithness (principal)
- Watten
- Edinburgh
- Glenorchy and Inishail
