1791
SuccessionJurisdictionLegitim.DebtAlimentCollationRebecca Hog pursued Thomas Hog of Newliston regarding an estate that included moveables situated in England, and Thomas answered that the Court might apply English law to those assets. After the Court pronounced an interlocutor, Thomas reclaimed and presented an additional petition, which Mrs Lashley and her husband answered by alleging that he had failed to comply with the order to furnish full states of the estate.AI-generated
Documents in this case (3)
- Mrs Rebecca Hog v. Thomas Hog — Answers, 26 Feb 1791February 26, 1791 Answers by Thomas Hog of Newliston to the petition for Mrs Rebecca Hog, arguing that the Court may apply English law to moveables situated in England
- Rebecca Hog v. Thomas Hog — Additional Petition, 10 Aug 1791August 10, 1791 Reclaiming Petition of Thomas Hog, Esq; asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor
- Rebecca Hog and Thomas Lashley v. Thomas Hog — Answers, 13 Oct 1791October 13, 1791 Answers by Mrs Lashley and her husband to the additional petition of Thomas Hog, Esq., arguing that the petitioner has failed to comply with the Court's order to furnish full states of the estate
People & places in this case
People involved
- Roger Hog, of Newliston — Party
- William Shaw — Party
- Thomas Brown, of Braid — Party
- David Henderson, Clerk — Party
- Captain James Moodie, of Melsetter — Party
- John Dalrymple, Earl of Stair — Party
- William Law, Esq., of Elvingston — Party
- William Bruce, of Symbister — Party
- John Clerk, Lord Eldin — Advocate for Party
- John MacLaurin, Lord Dreghorn — Lord Ordinary
- Sir James Fergusson, of Kilkerran, Lord Kilkerran — Lord Ordinary
- Henry Home, of Kames, Lord Kames — Lord Ordinary
- Sir John Nisbet, of Dirleton, Lord Dirleton — Lord Ordinary
- James Ferguson, 2nd Laird of Pitfour, Lord Pitfour — Lord Ordinary
Where this case took place
Published Reports
William Morison, The Decisions of the Court of Session (1811), pg. 4619
