1830–1832
ExpensesAssignationTackRentInterlocutorIrritancyWilliam Wotherspoon sought suspension of a decree obtained by Robert Wark ordering him to pay £9, 13s. 5½d. and extract dues. Wotherspoon defended the suspension on the ground that an assignation of lease from Mr Young was necessary for debt recovery, while denying Wark’s allegations of arrears and encroachment. He subsequently lodged a reclaiming note asking the Court to recall the interlocutor and suspend the letters simpliciter, and obtained an additional appendix allowing him to print the defences, replies, condescendence, and answers from the inferior court process.AI-generated
Documents in this case (4)
- William Wotherspoon v. Robert Wark — Suspension, 14 Jun 1830June 14, 1830 Bill of Suspension by William Wotherspoon against Robert Wark, asking the Court to suspend a decree ordering him to pay £9, 13s. 5½d. and £2, 10s. in process and extract dues.
- William Wotherspoon v. Robert Wark — Record, 5 Mar 1831Suspender William Wotherspoon defends assignation of lease from Mr Young as necessary debt recovery, denying charger Robert Wark’s claims of arrears and encroachment.
- William Wotherspoon v. Robert Wark — Reclaming, 20 Dec 1831December 20, 1831 Reclaiming Note by William Wotherspoon, Ainslie Place, Edinburgh, against Robert Wark of Bargiddie, asking the Court to recal the interlocutor and suspend the letters simpliciter
- William Wotherspoon v. Robert Wark — Additional, 30 Jan 1832January 30, 1832 Additional Appendix to Reclaiming Note of William Wotherspoon, allowing the suspender to print Defences, Replies, Condescendence, and Answers in the Inferior Court Process.
People & places in this case
People involved
- William Wotherspoon — Party
- John Cross — Party
- Robert Paton — Advocate for Party
- George Moir — Advocate for Party
- Alexander Wotherspoon — Advocate for Party
- Sir James Wellwood Moncrieff, Bart. — Lord Ordinary
- Charles Hay, of Newton, Lord Newton — Lord Ordinary
