1796
ValuationTeindsHeritorRentAugmentationStipendSkene, as pursuer, argued that the Court of Session lacked authority to lay victual augmentation upon teinds or to modify victual to a minister where the teinds had been valued in money. He submitted successive memorials contending that the commutation to a fixed monetary payment precluded any subsequent augmentation or modification in grain.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- George Skene of Skene v. Reverend Mr. James Hogg — Memorial, 21 Apr 1796April 21, 1796 Memorial of Mr. Skene, arguing that when teinds are valued in money, the Court cannot lay victual augmentation upon them
- James Hogg v. George Skene of Skene — Memorial, 28 Jun 1796June 28, 1796 Memorial of Mr Skene of Skene, arguing that the Court cannot modify victual to a minister when teinds are valued in money
People & places in this case
People involved
- James Hogg — Party
- George Skene, of Skene — Party
