1787–1788
DebtCreditorPromissory noteBill of ExchangePrescriptionSuccessionPatrick Fraser, merchant in Edinburgh, petitioned the Court to alter an interlocutor pronounced by Lord Eskgrove regarding his claim of debt. James Russel, William Cooper, and others, upholsterers in Edinburgh and trustees for Isobel Boog, answered the petition, contesting Fraser’s entitlement to the alteration. The dispute centered on whether the court should modify the prior interlocutor in favor of Fraser’s debt claim against the trust estate.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- Rossel, et al v. Fraser — Petition, 30 Nov 1787November 30, 1787 Petition of Patrick Frazer asking the Court to alter Lord Eskgrove's interlocutor
- James Russel and William Cooper v. Patrick Fraser — Answers, 15 Jan 1788January 15, 1788 Answers by James Russel and William Cooper, Upholsterers in Edinburgh, and others, Trustees for Isobel Boog, to the Petition of Patrick Fraser, Merchant in Edinburgh, responding to his claim of debt.
People & places in this case
People involved
- Patrick Frazer — Party
- Charles Hay, of Newton, Lord Newton — Advocate for Party
