1793
CopartnershipContractSaleDebtDissolutionPartnershipJames Kibble, defender in an action raised by Robert Corse, John Black, James Buchanan, and Archibald Buchanan, petitioned to alter the court’s interlocutor, arguing that a resolution of 11 July binding the partners to dissolve their firm at Candlemas 1793 violated the partnership’s unanimity clause. Corse and his co-pursuers answered, maintaining that Kibble acted against his own interest and sought injurious terms.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- Kibble — Petition, 2 Jan 1793James Kibble petitions to alter court’s interlocutor, arguing July 11 resolution binds partners’ dissolution to Candlemas 1793, violating unanimity clause.
- James Kibble v. Robert Corse, John Black, James Buchanan and Archibald Buchanan — Answers, 17 Jan 1793January 17, 1793 Answers by Robert Corse, John Black, James Buchanan, and Archibald Buchanan to the petition of James Kibble, arguing that the petitioner is acting against his own interest and seeking injurious terms.
People & places in this case
People involved
- James Kibble — Party
- John Black — Party
- Archibald Buchanan — Party
- Robert Corse — Party
- Allan Maconochie, Lord Meadowbank — Advocate for Party
- Robert Cullen, Lord Cullen — Advocate for Party
