1793
DebtCreditorPrescriptionBill of ExchangeTrusteeTrusteesThe creditors of Currie, represented by their common agent in the sale and ranking of the Estate of Newlaw, petitioned the Court to alter Lord Swinton’s interlocutor. The respondents contested the creditors’ attempt to rank debts against Currie’s estate, citing partial payments and post-prescription markings as evidence of debt continuity.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- Newlaw — Petition, 31 May 1793May 31, 1793 Petition of the Creditors and Common Agent in the Sale and Ranking of the Estate of Newlaw, asking the Court to alter Lord Swinton's interlocutor
- Geddes — Answers, 10 Oct 1793Respondents contest creditors' petition to rank debts against Currie's estate, citing partial payments and post-prescription markings as evidence of debt continuity.
People & places in this case
People involved
- David Currie — Party
- Mr. Robert Donaldson — Party
- James Milligan — Party
- John Bushby — Party
- James Macgill — Party
- John Kirk — Party
- John Christian — Party
- Thomas Clark — Party
- John Donaldson — Party
- Helen Graham — Party
- Major-General Thomas Goldie, of Goldielee — Party
- Andrew Muir — Party
- George Home, W.S., of Wedderburn and Paxton — Party
- William Sloan — Party
- James Smyth — Party
- John Kirkpatrick — Party
- Robert Corbet — Advocate for Party
- Alexander Goldie, W.S. — Advocate for Party
- James Currie — Advocate for Party
- William Erskine, Lord Kinneder — Advocate for Party
- John Swinton, Lord Swinton — Lord Ordinary
- Miss Agnes Boyd — Named in case documents