1798
CautionerDebtAssignationInterlocutorBankruptcyActionWilliam Inglis petitioned to reverse a court’s finding that defender William Bethune’s 1786 holograph bond was mere corroboration rather than new security, seeking to hold Bethune jointly liable for half the debt. Based on the single document cataloged for this case.AI-generated
Documents in this case (1)
- Inglis — Petition, 15 Jun 1798Petitioner William Inglis seeks to reverse a court’s finding that defender William Bethune’s 1786 holograph bond was mere corroboration, not new security, to hold him jointly liable for half the debt.
People & places in this case
People involved
- James Spence — Party
- James Murray, of Broughton — Party
- Patrick Miller — Party
- Henry David Inglis — Advocate for Party
- James Loch — Advocate for Party
- William Craig, Lord Craig — Lord Ordinary
