Date13 Oct 1796TypeState of the Process of ReductionCaseEliott v. CurriesLength109 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 12 Abstract AI-generated October 13, 1796 State of the Process of Sir William Eliott, Bart. against George and Thomas Currie, arguing that a tack granted under reduced rent by an heir of entail is void and null. People in this documentJohn Campbell, Lord StonefieldMr. James Smith, of BalharryArchibald James Edward Douglas, 1st Baron DouglasJames CurrieCornelius Elliot, W.S.SubjectsDebtRentAlimentLeaseSuccessionPossessionTackOathPlaces mentionedCarrickHallruleStobs