Date15 Jan 1791TypeRepliesCaseWilliam Campbell v. Sir John Anstruther, of Anstruther AuthorMatthew Ross, of CandieLength25 pagesRepositoryUniversity of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)ContainerUVALL Box 22 - Vol. 02 - Papers in Political Cases, 1790-1 - Kilrenny ElectionAppendix1 item Abstract AI-generated January 15, 1791 Replies by William Campbell and others, arguing that Sir John Anstruther and others have no legal right to challenge their election as Counsellors of Kilrenny View larger map →← William Campbell v. Sir John Anstruther, of Anstruther — v2 179101 manuscript CampbellAnstruther4 of 5 in this caseWilliam Campbell v. Sir John Anstruther — Duplies, 29 Jan 1791 →People in this documentSir Robert Anstruther, of Balcaskie, 3rd Baronet of Nova Scotia✳Robert Fall✳Andrew Glass✳SubjectsAdjudication✳Aliment✳Succession✳Statute✳Election✳Election contest✳Inhibition✳Reduction✳Places mentionedJedburgh✳Rutherglen✳Anstruther Easter✳Kilrenny✳London✳