Date4 May 1765TypeAnswersCaseEarl of Lauderdale v. George Inglis of ReidhallAuthorSir James Montgomery, of Stanhope, Esq.Length12 pagesRepositoryWilliam & Mary School of Law, Wolf LibraryContainerW&M Wolf 2Appendix1 item Abstract AI-generated May 4, 1765 Answers by George Inglis of Reidball to the petition of James Earl of Lauderdale, responding to the argument that his right to the tithes is not established by prescription. View larger map →← Earl of Lauderdale v. George Inglis of Reidhall — Petition, 28 Feb 17654 of 4 in this casePeople in this documentSir James Montgomery, of Stanhope, Esq.✳James Lauderdale, Earl of Lauderdale✳SubjectsAdjudication✳Prescription✳Teinds✳Tack✳Infeftment✳Inhibition✳Reduction✳Seisin✳Places mentionedEdinburgh✳Dunfermline✳Musselburgh✳