Document Type Replies
Case Findlay v. Graham
Author Name William Craig, Lord Craig
Submitted 26 Feb 1773
Marginalia? No
Main Document Length (Pages) 7
Appendix Items
Appendix Length (pages)
Repository University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)
Container UVALL Box 02

Citation

William Craig, Lord Craig, "Replies for Poor James Findlay pursuer, to the Answers for John Graham of Dougaldston and others defenders," 26 Feb 1773 , Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive Project. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Law Library, 2015-2019.

Related Case Materials

Unto the Right Honourable the Lords of Council and Session, the Petition of Poor James Findlay late Tenant in Keppoch, now in Glasgow, Pursuer

Answers for John Graham of Dougaldston, and others, Defenders; to the Petition of Poor James Finlay, late Tenant in Keppoch, now in Glasgow, Pursuer

Unto the Right Honourable the Lords of Council and Session, the Petition of Poor James Findlay, late Tenant in Keppoch, now in Glasgow, Pursuer

Answers for John Graham of Dougaldston, and others, Defenders; to the Petition of Poor James Finlay in Glasgow, Pursuer

Replies for Poor James Findlay pursuer, to the Answers for John Graham of Dougaldston and others defenders

Unto the Right Honourable the Lords of Council and Session, the Petition of John Graham of Dougaldston, and others

Answers for Poor James Findlay, late Tenant in Keppoch, now in Glasgow; to the Petition of John Graham of Dougaldston, and others