1794
BankruptcyDebtSequestrationTrusteeCreditorBill of ExchangeThe trustee argued that the Harrisons' claims were invalid for lack of indorsement and because they were founded upon post-bankruptcy acknowledgments. Based on the single document cataloged for this case.AI-generated
Documents in this case (2)
- Edward Chippendall v. William and John Harrison — Information, 14 Jun 1794June 14, 1794 Information of the trustee, arguing that claims by Messrs Harrison are invalid due to lack of indorsement and post-bankruptcy acknowledgments
People & places in this case
People involved
- John Barr — Party
- Sir John Anstruther, of Anstruther, Baronet — Party
- John Clerk, Lord Eldin — Advocate for Party
- Alexander Murray, Lord Henderland — Lord Ordinary
Places
- London (principal)
- Perth
- Birmingham
- Middlesex
Where this case took place
Published Reports
William Morison, The Decisions of the Court of Session (1811), pg. 1620
