Cases connected to this place (6)

  • Harrisons v. Chippendale
    The trustee argued that the Harrisons' claims were invalid for lack of indorsement and because they were founded upon post-bankruptcy acknowledgments. Based on the single document cataloged for this case.
  • George Crichton v. William Bell and William Downe Gillon
    George Crichton pursued William Bell and William Downe Gillon regarding expenses. After Lord Mackenzie pronounced an interlocutor finding that no expenses were due to either party, Bell reclaimed against that determinat…
  • James Blyth v. Maberly's Assignees
    James Blyth, as agent for John Maberly and Company and as holder of funds belonging to the firm, raised an action of multiplepoinding against Maberly's assignees to require them to produce their rights to the fund in hi…
  • Remington, Crawford, and Company, and Others v. Mrs. and Miss Bruce and Sir Michael Bruce and Others
    Remington, Crawford, and Company and other creditors pursued Mrs. Bruce, Miss Bruce, and Sir Michael Bruce to reduce an 1819 land disposition favoring the heirs, alleging it created unlawful preferences prejudicial to o…
  • York-Buildings Company v. Martin, Stone, and Foote
    The York-Buildings Company pursued an action against Martin, Stone, and Foote to revise the Court's interlocutors of 1783 and 1786 and to overturn Lord Monboddo's interlocutor respecting objections to adjudications agai…
  • Ross v. Trustees of Hugh Ross
    John Hunter, Archibald Swinton, and David Limond, as trustees for Hugh Ross of Kerse and his creditors, petitioned the Court to alter its recent interlocutor in the action brought by Ross against them. Based on the sing…

Trace this place in the network explorer →