Date18 Dec 1764TypeInformationCaseEarl of Lauderdale v. George Inglis of ReidhallAuthorDavid RaeLength12 pagesRepositoryWilliam & Mary School of Law, Wolf LibraryContainerW&M Wolf 2MarginaliaYesAppendix1 item Abstract AI-generated Dec 18, 1764: Earl of Lauderdale claims title to Reidball teinds via inheritance and inhibition, rejecting defender’s claims from sale and prescription. View larger map →1 of 4 in this caseEarl of Lauderdale v. George Inglis — Information, 18 Dec 1764 →People in this documentSir David Rae, Lord Eskgrove, 1st BaronetSir John Maitland, of ThirlestaneJames Lauderdale, Earl of LauderdaleJames Urquhart, of MeldrumSubjectsAdjudicationBankruptcySuccessionPrescriptionTeindsTackPatronageDispositionPlaces mentionedEdinburghMusselburgh