Date18 Dec 1764TypeInformationCaseEarl of Lauderdale v. George Inglis of ReidhallAuthorJames BurnettLength10 pagesRepositoryWilliam & Mary School of Law, Wolf LibraryContainerW&M Wolf 2Appendix1 item Abstract AI-generated December 18, 1764 Information of George Inglis of Reidball, defender, arguing that his right to the teinds is not challenged by the Earl of Lauderdale, and that his prescription is unbroken by inhibitions. View larger map →← James Earl of Lauderdale v. George Inglis of Reidball — Information, 18 Dec 17642 of 4 in this caseEarl of Lauderdale v. George Inglis of Reidhall — Petition, 28 Feb 1765 →People in this documentJames Burnett, Lord Monboddo✳SubjectsBankruptcy✳Prescription✳Teinds✳Infeftment✳Inhibition✳Citation✳Charter✳Heritor✳Places mentionedEdinburgh✳Leith✳