Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

William Macdonald v. Mrs Macdonald otherwise Lillie and John Lillie — Answers, 12 Jun 1815 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondents challenge petitioner's account of agency terms and security arrangements in a dispute over financial management of Finlarig's estate.

Mrs M'Donald otherwise Lillie and John Lillie v. Hector M'Neal and William Macdonald — Answers, 19 Feb 1814

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by Hector M'Neal to the argument of Mrs Lillie and others, asserting that the assignation in question was intimated to Captain Macneill and that no damage accrued.

Petition — William Macdonald of St Martins, Esquire, Advocate [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Petition of William Macdonald asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor in a process raised against his father, by Mrs Macdonald, otherwise Lillie, &c.

Lady Mary Lindsay Crawford v. Archibald Reid — Answers, 5 Sep 1816

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondent defends against petition alleging unauthorized absence and misconduct, asserting prior tacit permission and absence was justified by necessity.

John Wallace v. Alexander Morrison — Answers, 10 Sep 1812

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondents challenge petitioners' claim to Society funds, asserting the petitioners unlawfully squandered money on frivolous litigation and denied feuars' lawful well rights.

William Kerr v. James Marshall — Answers, 21 Jun 1815 [2]

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondent denies universal custom claim; petitioners defend lawful society spending on well rights litigation.

William Kerr v. James Marshall — Answers, 21 Jun 1815 [3]

Abstract
AI-generated
Answers by James Marshall, Yarn-Merchant, Glasgow, to the petition of William Kerr, Writer in Greenock.

Concluded.—William Kerr Act—James Marshall

Abstract
AI-generated
Condescendence action by William Kerr, Writer in Greenock, against James Marshall, Tacksman in Glasgow, concerning business dealings including lending, securities, and estate purchases.

Reclaiming Petition — William Kerr against Inner-House Interlocutor

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioner seeks to overturn an interlocutor holding him liable for full unpaid accounts of his deceased Glasgow agent, arguing he was only responsible for sums actually recovered under longstanding professional custom.

Petition — Jas. Marshall for New Trial

Abstract
AI-generated
Petitioner seeks new trial on grounds verdict contradicts evidence regarding alleged 'practice and understanding' between Greenock and Glasgow writers.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Current page 11
  • Page 12
  • Page 13
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in