Joseph Millar
Name
Joseph Miller
Occupation
Alias
Jo. Millar
Connections
Life Dates
-
John King v. John Mason — Answers, 29 Jul 1786 [2]
Abstract
July 29, 1786 Answers by John Mason tenant in Reading to the petition of John King Fletcher in Glasgow, responding to the pursuer's claim of over-payment and disputed receipts.
LC Volume 02 — Petition, 12 Jul 1786 [2]
Abstract
July 12, 1786 Petition of John King, Flesher in Glasgow, asking the Court to alter Lord Ankerville's interlocutor
Mrs Barbara Lowther v. Murdoch Maclean and the Trustees of the late Archibald Maclean — Memorial, 30 Nov 1786
Abstract
Mrs Barbara Lowther, Nov 30, 1786, argues a widow’s aliment claim from husband’s estate survives the year-and-day rule, regardless of no issue.
Mrs Margaret Ayton and Andrew Blackburn v. Robert and Peter Colvills — Answers, 13 Nov 1781
Abstract
November 13, 1781 Answers by Mrs Margaret Ayton and Andrew Blackburn to the petition of Mess. Robert and Peter Colvills, arguing that the defenders are entitled to the entailed estate by right of succession and not subject to creditors' claims.
Matthew Paterson v. James Black and Others — Summons, 1812 [2]
Abstract
Matthew Paterson sues Glasgow magistrates and council members for damages after his lowest bid for masonry work was unjustly rejected in favor of higher bidders.
John Duncan in Braehead, and the Trustee on his Sequestrated Estate v. William Forbes of Cullander, Esq. — Answers, 29 May 1812
Abstract
May 29, 1812 Answers by William Forbes of Cullander to the petition of John Duncan, asserting that the tenant's notour bankruptcy triggers ipso facto voidance of the lease as stipulated.
LC Volume 01 — Petition, 13 May 1812 [2]
Abstract
May 13, 1812 Petition of John Duncan asking the Court to alter its recent interlocutor
LC Volume 01 — Petition, 10 Sep 1812 [2]
Abstract
September 10, 1812 Petition of Potts, Cooke, & Potts asking the Court to alter interlocutors of the Judge-Admiral and Lord Ordinary in a maritime insurance case against underwriters in Greenock.
Hugh Hamilton and others v. Mess. Potts, Cooke, and Potts — Answers, 12 May 1812
Abstract
May 12, 1812 Answers by Messrs. Potts, Cooke, and Potts, Merchants in London, and their Mandatory, to the bill of suspension for Hugh Hamilton and others, Underwriters in Greenock, responding to the claim that the vessel was unseaworthy.
