Skip to main content
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • instagram
Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive
SCOS The Scottish Court of Session Papers University of Virginia Law Library
  • Explore
    • Map
    • Browse by County
    • People & Place Network
  • Scholarship
  • About
    • The 2026 Modernization
    • Searching the Archive
    • Computational Methods
  • Search
  • News

Breadcrumb

  1. Home

Robert Fall v. Robert Louthean and Others — Information, 9 Feb 1791

Robert Fall v. Robert Louthean — Information, 9 Feb 1791

Abstract
AI-generated
February 9, 1791 Information of Robert Fall, arguing that the Town Council of Kilrenny illegally deprived him of his office as councillor and elected others in his absence

Robert Fall v. Robert Louthean and Others

Repository & Extent

University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)

Andrew Gray v. David Wilson — Duplies, 29 Jan 1791

Abstract
AI-generated
January 29, 1791 Duplies for David Wilson, &c. to the Replies for Andrew Gray, &c. arguing that Baillie Chalmers had no right to vote unless there was an equality of votes

Andrew Gray and Others v. David Wilson and Others — Replies, 14 Jan 1791

Abstract
AI-generated
January 14, 1791 Replies of the Bailies, Counsellors, and Treasurer of Anstruther Easter, arguing that the election of the complainers is valid and that the presiding magistrate has no ordinary vote, only a casting vote in case of equality.

David Wilson &c. v. Andrew Gray &c. — Answers, 7 Dec 1790

Abstract
AI-generated
Defendants defend election of councillors and officers in Anstruther Easter, asserting legal voting rights and casting vote validity.

Andrew Gray and Others vs. David Wilson and Others — Petition and Complaint, 13 Nov 1790

Abstract
AI-generated
November 13, 1790 Petition and Complaint of Andrew Gray, &c. asking the Court to void the pretended election of certain Magistrates and Counsellors of Anstruther Easter and to declare the complainers as the legal elected officers.

Andrew Gray and Others vs. David Wilson and Others

Repository & Extent

University of Virginia Law Library (Special Collections)

James Hogg, &c. v. James Bruce, &c. — Duplies, 29 Jan 1791

Abstract
AI-generated
Respondents defend election of James Bruce as Councillor, challenging validity of interim election and vote, citing statutory time limits and lack of prior notice.

James Bruce v. James Hogg — Replies, 14 Jan 1791

Abstract
AI-generated
January 14, 1791 Replies of James Bruce and others, Counsellors and Magistrates of the Borough of Anstruther Easter, to the Answers of James Hogg and others, pretending to be such.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 835
  • Page 836
  • Page 837
  • Page 838
  • Current page 839
  • Page 840
  • Page 841
  • Page 842
  • Page 843
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Subscribe to
Home

The Scottish Court of Session Digital Archive is a multi-institutional collaborative initiative featuring Session Papers held by the Arthur J. Morris Law Library at the University of Virginia School of Law, the Library of Congress, and the University of Edinburgh.

The project is made possible with generous investments from the Horatio and Florence Farmer Fund at the University of Virginia School of Law and the William Nelson Cromwell Foundation. 

Support SCOS with a tax deductible gift.

© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
© 2026 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia

User account menu

  • Log in